Відео

the brainworx make all a little bit darker

Resumindo: qual monitor eu compro?

thanks for explaining.... it's helpful

GREAT Video!! Any way to make the TEXT of the media bay BBBIIIGGGGGGEEERRRR!!!!????

Use MA1 not Sonar Worx

lol you understand ohms rms & spl headroom of speaker size yet ?

thnx brother

Kevin holy mackerel buddy this is studio changing info. I’m in the ‘something isn’t working with my KRK’s’ phase and looking at Focal and Adam Audio speakers but your info has halted all that. I ordered the Mixing Secrets book before I buy anything and thank you so much for putting this out there from your own hard earned research. I’ve already recommended to several friends also in the “I need new speakers” phase to watch your info first. Can’t thank you enough brother. This should be required viewing for anyone interested in audio Mixing , Mastering and I’d even say Tracking. Thanks!

Transparency is the name of the game and with that desk in front of You, you have none. By the way headphones without EQ are not transparent. People don't buy the book just do a bit more search online...

Great video, very useful and help for me as a newbie. I see you wave form look fuzzy in the middle, mine also are like this, what causes it to be like that, do you know.

Objectivity triggers some nasty feelings with musicians, there is some magic mentality that makes them so angry when it comes to digital speaker calibration. In the photography and videography world it is a norm to use a calibrated screen, but somehow musicians simply ignore the fact that there is no speaker sound but speaker + room sound only. Great video, let's hope people still listen and learn instead of religiously defending their mantra that you need just to get used to all the spikes and deeps in frequency response. Pfff...

I have Cubase sx3 and it doesn't have the "control room tab"...what can I do?

Buy a god set of headphones, room problem solved.

7 years and still valid and helpful video... thank you.

even in cheap earbuds I can hear significant difference how smooth the transients are handled by the hw piece. Even the most expensive software emulations cannot handle transient heavy material such as acoustic guitar better than the basic 100$ DBX 160A. To my taste the UA emulation of the 1176LN is the best overall software compressor, but for acoustic guitar I always put spiff or punctuale of any other transient shaper after to soften harsh spikes left after sw compressors

Thank you - clear and concise video , just what I needed!

It was hella helpful. Thanks a lot

My automation is not exporting from cubase any ideas?

Thank you for sharing your sound journey! I picked up the book on amazon. Going to give that run before making some bigger decisions!

This is not how this Master Buss compressor is supposed to be used. Instead of using an already mixed track, it is better to simulator individual tracks (bass, guitars, vocals, drums) all routed to the master buss where this compressor "glues" all those tracks together into one cohesive stereo track. The audio tracks used here are already mixed and will not produce the same results as individual tracks.

I fkin hate autoplay.

13:00 I'm a bit confusing about those decay times. They should almost entirely depens on you studio and acoustic treatment and not on the speaker itself.

Thinking about this it doesn’t make sense to me. Avatones and NS10’s don’t have any bass so you’re basically using the midrange to balance the tracks which is what they are meant for. For the low-end you need a sub, near fields are not going to give you any indication what happens between 30 and 50 Hz. If you happen to get it right without it’s because you know how your system translates or just a lucky coincidence. The decay time is definitely important but this needs to be addressed with speaker placement, room size, bass traps, absorption and diffusion. Removing the bass from your monitors isn’t going to solve it imo 😊

I like it, Testing for the difference in 32 bit flot and 64 bit float.

Hi who can I use my audient id14 AND my mg30 guitar modeller together. As it is also an interface. Pulling my hair out over this one.

NS10s and auratones were reference monitors. I couldn't imagine anyone basing their entire mix on them, but to each their own I guess.

Time for an updated one of that latest MB.

A single reference is a poor reference, then again, Daft Punk mastered on a ghettoblaster. Headphones can remove room modes and allow you to really zoom in the details, can't recommend them enough. I did my best mastering going back and forth headphones and monitors.

33 min..too long..how about a 10 min Video?

And you can switch plugin Presets (!!) on the fly, you can record this as automation... Big feature!!

Just tried it. Holy cow does it work well!

One can quickly go bonkers and get technically obsessive with this shit, hehe. Get very close (as in intimate) with your “the sound", work with what you have, get to know your tools (cheap or expensive) take reference, take constructive criticism, create art, and worry not :)

6:30 "Boughten" - learn to speak English.

Ya haha shoulda edited his recording lmao

Some now use the Cubase sample tracks for the drums, which has the advantage that you are a little more flexible and the samples are also in the project. With the Groove Agent you would have to save the kit with the samples in any case?

This is a really great video! Thank you so much!

What's the decay time of Yamaha HS8?

THANKS!

So if my Trance project is 140BPM and I have used a song/vocal at 125BPM, I can tweak it with Warp and not using "Musical Mode" ? Since musical-mode would put the vocal aligned but it would also make the vocal "faster". What is the way to do it?

Rumor has it, his mixes still suck in his car.

look up coaxial PA speaker drivers. like the FaitalPro 6Hx150 that’s what you need in a homemade correctly sized box.

When looking for monitors, actually mixing on them and seeing how the mixes translate before pulling the trigger is a great idea. When using a compressor can you actually hear the changes you're making? When using an EQ, can you hear the changes you're making. If you can't hear these things its an absolute deal breakers!! No matter what monitors you end up with consider pairing them with 1 mixcube and your chances of translation increases considerably because you'll be better nailing the midrange. Room acoustics are important too. It doesn't have to be "perfect" but you do need some thicker acoustic panels on the surrounding walls. Theres a lot of info out there about how to do this. Room treatment isn't as appealing as gear, but it is very important if you want to take mix translation seriously.

Looking to upgrade my monitoring system, your video came up!! Thank you for all this information

The "extended decay" has to do with wavelength. Lower frequencies, have longer wavelengths, meaning if all frequencies are played back at a similar SPL, the bass frequencies will decay more slowly. This can be mitigated by the correct (and yes, correct, not just any) acoustic treatment of a room. A lot of people simply buy any random set of acoustic panels, because "it looks pro." Having acoustic panels, makes it look like you know what you're doing and all that. But you need panels that will absorb the frequencies where your issues occur. So, why does the NS10's have so short decay time for the bass register then? Well, simply because it doesn't produce much bass. They start dropping off very high up in the bass register. This means that the bass frequencies will have lower energy, and hence they drop off quicker. If you look at the graphs again, you can see that every speaker with a more extended bass register, also has longer decay...almost like these two things are directly related. Neat, huh? If you add a subwoofer to the system, well, then you'll have those issues with long decay again. Then comes the big question: Are you certain that the sound in your car is anywhere near correct? I mean, it might sound enjoyable, or what you might perceive as "good", especially if you've gotten really used to listening to music in it. But is it accurate? Especially if you're doing EDM, I would imagine that the kind of sound you want in your car is on the, ehh, let's say "more cheerful" side. This is very common. If your ultimate goal is to get a sound that is identical to what you're hearing in your car, then start mixing in your car. Bring the project on a laptop into your car, hook it up, and do the final mixing there. Most likely, your mixing room sounds a LOT more linear and ideal in terms of audio reproduction, than your car does. Meaning, the problem isn't with your mix, but with the playback in your car.

no comp: 4:25 ssl: 4:46 waves: 5:08 native instruments: 5:29 bx: 5:50 cytomic: 6:12

Thank you!!!

Thank You So Much!!!

Of course the Yamaha’s roll off the bass so good. Because they don’t have any bass to roll off. You can easily roll off what’s not there.

Great video and a massive game changer 👍🏽

Thanks alot